As it is well known that the income tax department has allowed Aadhaar card holders to use the biometric id number in lieu of the Permanent Account Number (PAN). But as per new provision of Income Tax, fine of Rs. 10,000 may be levied in case of wrong Aadhar Number. As per the latest amendments in the Finance Bill 2019, not only allowed people to use Aadhaar in lieu of PAN but also introduced a penalty for giving a false Aadhaar number. However, the new penalty rules are applicable only in cases where you are using Aadhaar in lieu of PAN and where quoting PAN is mandatory according to the income tax department rules. It is well known that although Aadhaar is issued by the Unique Identity Authority of India, yet the fine is not imposed by UIDAI but by the income tax department. Under Section 272B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the department can impose a penalty in case of default in complying with provisions relating to PAN, i.e., failure to obtain, quote, or authenticate PAN.
The ITEF issued a circular after
the meeting of PGRC which was held on 25th March, 2014 as scheduled. The outcome of the meeting on some of the agenda items is as under:
Cadre
Restructuring : On the matter of Cadre Restructuring it is informed
that there will not be reduction of posts in any charge and all charges will
get the entitled additional posts. The proposal is now awaiting the final
approval of the Finance Minister and in all probabilities the same will be
notified by 31st March 2014. Read previous post in this regard : Status of Cadre Restructuring of IT and Dearness Allowance
Recruitment
Rules : The Officials in the
HRD is working on it and the Representative of ITEF have been asked to discuss
the same with them.
Laptops
to Inspectors : It is informed that there was some confusion in
the DOE about various proposals viz. Replacement of laptops to Officers,
Provision of Laptops to AO & PS etc. Now the proposal for Laptops to ITIs
has been detached and resubmitted. The Directorate (infra) is pursuing the
matter.
Mobile
hands to all personnel: This
proposal is pending for approval from the Dept. Of Expenditure.
Enhancement
of Local Travel Expenses of ITIs / NSs: The proposal approved by the
Board and submitted to the IFU has been returned for further clarifications.
The Clarifications and suggestions sought from the Chief Commissioners are
awaited to further the matter. It is also informed that none of the CCsIT have
respond yet, except the CCsIT of Bhuvaneswar, Hyderabad, Bangalore and
Chandigarh..
Adv.
Increment to Sr. TA / Stgr. on passing ITIs Examination: The Member (P & V) directed the
Directorate (V & L) to further examine the matter in the light of the
favourable verdicts of various CA Tribunals.
Objection
raised by ITEF on publication of communication on irsofficersonline: ITEF
strongly objected to the publication of communications on service and other
administrative matters through the official website of IRS Officers only, access to
which is restricted to IRS Officers with pass word. The assurance for putting all
such communication in the official website of the department i.e. www.incometaxindia.gov.in
is given.
Comments
Post a Comment