As it is well known that the income tax department has allowed Aadhaar card holders to use the biometric id number in lieu of the Permanent Account Number (PAN). But as per new provision of Income Tax, fine of Rs. 10,000 may be levied in case of wrong Aadhar Number. As per the latest amendments in the Finance Bill 2019, not only allowed people to use Aadhaar in lieu of PAN but also introduced a penalty for giving a false Aadhaar number. However, the new penalty rules are applicable only in cases where you are using Aadhaar in lieu of PAN and where quoting PAN is mandatory according to the income tax department rules. It is well known that although Aadhaar is issued by the Unique Identity Authority of India, yet the fine is not imposed by UIDAI but by the income tax department. Under Section 272B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the department can impose a penalty in case of default in complying with provisions relating to PAN, i.e., failure to obtain, quote, or authenticate PAN.
ITEF, Mumbai published a message on
the ITEF (CHQ) circular on Cadre Restructuring as under
"We reproduce below the circular
issued by the ITEF (CHQ) on the cadre restructuring and terms of reference of
7th CPC. The CBDT Chairperson's message is a clear pointer to the deceit and
treachery played out by the CBDT on the issue of cadre restructuring. We will
have to react to this perfidy with all our united mite without caring for the
revenue collection or
Like ITian India on Facebook
Like ITian India on Facebook
time-barring assessments as no
authority should do such a breach of trust after giving assurances after
assurances of discussions on the issues.
G.S. ITEF, Mumbai.
CADRE RESTRUCTURING OF INCOME TAX
DEPARTMENT.
According to the signing off
message (Published in the website of IRS Officers) of the outgoing Chairperson,
CBDT, the proposal of allocation of posts and other Recruitment Rules etc. have
been approved by the CBDT and sent to the Finance Minister for approval. It is
also mentioned that the CCAs have been directed to be ready for implementation.
This is in contravention of the understanding reached between the ITEF and the
Member (P & V) on 17.01.2014 that the Board will cause discussion with ITEF
Representative again after finalisation of the proposal for allocation of posts
and as such, a breach of trust."
Comments
Post a Comment