As it is well known that the income tax department has allowed Aadhaar card holders to use the biometric id number in lieu of the Permanent Account Number (PAN). But as per new provision of Income Tax, fine of Rs. 10,000 may be levied in case of wrong Aadhar Number. As per the latest amendments in the Finance Bill 2019, not only allowed people to use Aadhaar in lieu of PAN but also introduced a penalty for giving a false Aadhaar number. However, the new penalty rules are applicable only in cases where you are using Aadhaar in lieu of PAN and where quoting PAN is mandatory according to the income tax department rules. It is well known that although Aadhaar is issued by the Unique Identity Authority of India, yet the fine is not imposed by UIDAI but by the income tax department. Under Section 272B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the department can impose a penalty in case of default in complying with provisions relating to PAN, i.e., failure to obtain, quote, or authenticate PAN. ...
Today
ITEF issued a circular and informed about the meeting of ITEF and ITGOA
representatives with DGIT(HRD) and other officials on 3rd December,
2013 on the issue of implementation of NR Parmar Judgement. The meeting felt that some more details are to be obtained from various agencies of Governmentt/section of CBDT etc. and decided to meet again on 11.12.2013 to finalize the issue.
Like ITian India on Facebook
Like ITian India on Facebook
The part
of ITEF’s Circular on the matter is as under:
“On our persistent demand and discussions with the Chairperson and
Member (P&V), for withdrawal of the Instructions issued by the CBDT on 15th
October, 2013 and issuance of clear instructions to CCAs regarding the manner
of implementation to bring about uniformity in the matter in all Charges, a
meeting of ITEF and ITGOA representatives were convened by the DGIT (HRD) and
other Officials on 3rd December, 2013. In
the meeting broad consensus were reached on many of the points to implement the
Judgement. In order to convey a clear
cut and uniform instructions to the CCAs, the meeting felt that some more
details are to be obtained from various agencies of the Government/sections of
CBDT etc. and decided to meet again on 11th December, 2013 to finalaise the
issue. We are hopeful that the matter
will be resolved in the said meeting and proper instructions issued thereafter
to CCAs to implement the judgement in a uniform manner in all Charges and in
all Cadres.”
Comments
Post a Comment