As it is well known that the income tax department has allowed Aadhaar card holders to use the biometric id number in lieu of the Permanent Account Number (PAN). But as per new provision of Income Tax, fine of Rs. 10,000 may be levied in case of wrong Aadhar Number. As per the latest amendments in the Finance Bill 2019, not only allowed people to use Aadhaar in lieu of PAN but also introduced a penalty for giving a false Aadhaar number. However, the new penalty rules are applicable only in cases where you are using Aadhaar in lieu of PAN and where quoting PAN is mandatory according to the income tax department rules. It is well known that although Aadhaar is issued by the Unique Identity Authority of India, yet the fine is not imposed by UIDAI but by the income tax department. Under Section 272B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the department can impose a penalty in case of default in complying with provisions relating to PAN, i.e., failure to obtain, quote, or authenticate PAN.
In
his Budget Speech 2013-14 in the Parliament on 28.02.2013, the Finance Minister
had announced as under:
“An emerging economy must have a tax
system that reflects best global practices. I propose to set-up a Tax
Administration Reform Commission to review the application of tax policies and
tax laws and submit periodic reports that can be implemented to strengthen the
capacity of our tax system.”
Accordingly, the government has
set-up a Tax Administration Reform Commission (TARC). The term of the
Commission will be 18 months. The Chairman of the Commission is Dr.
Parthasarathy Shome and will be in the rank of Minister of State.
The
Terms of Reference of the Commission will be as follows:-
· To review the existing
mechanism and recommend appropriate organizational structure for tax governance
with special reference to deployment of workforce commensurate with functional
requirements, capacity building, vigilance administration, responsibility and
accountability of human resources, key performance indicators, assessment, grading and promotion systems, and structures
to promote quality decision making at the highest policy levels.
· To review the existing business
processes of tax governance including the use of information and communication
technology and recommend measures for tax governance best suited to Indian
context.
· To review the existing
mechanism of dispute resolution covering time and compliance cost and recommend
measures for strengthening the same. This includes domestic and international
taxation.
· To review the existing
mechanism and recommend capacity building measures for preparing impact
assessment statements on taxpayers compliance cost of new policy and
administrative measures of the tax Departments.
· To review the existing
mechanism and recommend measures for deepening and widening of tax base and
taxpayer base.
· To review the existing
mechanism and recommend a system to enforce better tax compliance - by size,
segment and nature of taxes and taxpayers, that should cover methods to
encourage voluntary tax compliance.
· To review the existing
mechanism and recommend measures for improved taxpayer services and taxpayers
education programme. This includes mechanism for grievance redressal,
simplified and timely disbursal of duty drawback, export incentives,
rectification procedures, tax refunds etc.
· To review the existing mechanism and
recommend measures for “Capacity building” in emerging areas of Customs
administration relating to Border Control, National Security, International
Data Exchange and securing of supply chains.
· To review the existing mechanism and
recommend measures for strengthening of Database and Inter-agency information
sharing, not only between Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) and Central
Board of Excise and Customs(CBEC) but also with the banking and financial
sector, Central Economic Intelligence Bureau (CEIB), Financial Intelligence
Unit (FlU), Enforcement Directorate etc. and use of tools for utilization
of such information to ensure
compliance.
· To review the existing
mechanism and recommend appropriate means including staff resources for
forecasting, analysis and monitoring of revenue targets.
· To review the existing policy
and recommend measures for research inputs to tax governance.
· To review the existing
mechanism and recommend measures to enhance predictive analysis to detect and
prevent tax/economic offences.
· Any other issue which the
government may specify during the tenure of the Commission.
Source : PIB
Comments
Post a Comment