As it is well known that the income tax department has allowed Aadhaar card holders to use the biometric id number in lieu of the Permanent Account Number (PAN). But as per new provision of Income Tax, fine of Rs. 10,000 may be levied in case of wrong Aadhar Number. As per the latest amendments in the Finance Bill 2019, not only allowed people to use Aadhaar in lieu of PAN but also introduced a penalty for giving a false Aadhaar number. However, the new penalty rules are applicable only in cases where you are using Aadhaar in lieu of PAN and where quoting PAN is mandatory according to the income tax department rules. It is well known that although Aadhaar is issued by the Unique Identity Authority of India, yet the fine is not imposed by UIDAI but by the income tax department. Under Section 272B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the department can impose a penalty in case of default in complying with provisions relating to PAN, i.e., failure to obtain, quote, or authenticate PAN. ...
Grant of one increment in pre-revised pay scale — Board’s letter dated 23.03.2012 — clarification regarding.
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
(BHARAT SARKAR)
MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS
(RAIL MANTRALAYA)
(Railway Board)
S.No.PC-VI/322 RBE No. 63/2013
No.PC-VI/2012/I/RSRP/1 New Delhi, dated 03.07.2013
The GMs/CAOs(R),
All Indian Railways & Production Units (As per mailing list)
Sub: Grant of one increment in pre-revised pay scale — Board’s letter dated 23.03.2012 — clarification regarding.
Board’s letter of even
number dated 23.03.2012 provides that, those Railway employees who were due to
get their annual increment between February, 2006 to June, 2006 may be granted
one increment as on 01.01.2006 in the pre-revised pay scale as a one time
measure and, thereafter, will get the next increment in the revised pay
structure on 01.7.2006.
2. As per Board’s letter
No.PC-VI/2008/1/RSRP/1 dated 11.9.2008 fitment tables have been prescribed in
Annexure-E thereto, specifying the stage of revised pay in the revised pay band
with reference to each stage of pre- revised pay in various pre-revised pay
scales,. As per the fitment tables, the stage of revised pay in the pay band
has been mentioned at the same stage in respect of two consecutive pre-revised
stages of pay in cases of certain pre- revised pay scales.
3. References have been
received seeking clarification as to whether in cases where the fitment table
provides for the same revised stage in case of two consecutive pre-revised
stages in a particular pre-revised scale of pay, the benefit of bunching is
admissible after grant of one increment in the pre- revised pay scale by virtue
of Board’s letter dated 23_03.2012.
4. The matter has been
considered and it is clarified that Fitment Table contained in the aforesaid
letter dated 11.9.2008 is to be Strictly followed for fixation of pay in the
revised structure without any deviation.
5. In cases where the
stages of fixation of pay in the revised pay band as per fitment table
contained in the aforesaid letter dated 11.9.2008 provides for the same revised
stage in the Pay Band with reference to two consecutive stages of pre-revised
pay in the corresponding pre-revised empscales, then in such cases due to
application of Board’s letter dated 23.3.2012, there will be no change in the
revised pay as on 01.01.2006, if the revised stage with reference to the
pre-revised pay after accounting for one increment in the pre- revised scale
does not undergo any change as per the Fitment Table. It is also clarified that
no further bunching will be allowed in such cases and no re- fixation of pay
will be admissible in the revised pay as on 01.01.2006.
6. This issues with the
concurrence of the Finance Directorate of the Ministry of Railways.
sd/-
(Hari Krishan)
Director, Pay Commission
Railway Board.
[http://www.indianrailways.gov.in/railwayboard/uploads/directorate/pay_comm/PC6/2013/RBE_63_2013.PDF]
Comments
Post a Comment